Adam Greenfield is dealing with Godly AI interfaces.
What is ubiquitous computing?
Well, what happens when computers get cheaper, faster, better? They become invisible, but all around us. The possibilities to crunch concepts, data, information explode. We move into a post-graphical user interface, from gesture to voice.
Multiple users, multiple spaces. Moving away from the one-to-one paradigm.
Human behavior and ubicomp become as one. “The activation process dissolves away into the behavior of people.” Ubicomp is already social. Once devices become ambient, social interactions can meld into a contextualization of backgrounds, ideas and relevance.
- It’s present at the level of the body to world interface, as with data captures of physical movement to track, say, the range of motion of an elbow.
- It’s present at the level of a particular space — a room — to a processor reading the reactions of the room.
- It’s present at the street level, reacting to movement on the street and surveillance of social interactions
Ubicomp can crunch a variety of input or data, all passed through a relational database to construct information or entertainment for digestion.
People live life in real-time, while ubicomp works with their behavior to support their needs/desires. Space is never neutral, as the politics of position can be taken in numerous degrees.
Ubicomp is now. Why?
The digital home is the next big market and the future is structurally latent. (Crazy meta-meta-meta tagging in the real). Also, public safety comes into play. Post-9/11 mentality has crept in with, “Reduce the publics fear, reduce access and monitor activity.” We need to engage in ubicomp to control our destiny and the degree of misery which could be on the horizon.
Locus of attention disappears with ubicomp, so troubleshooting the invisible become a cognitive challenge. Signage is incredibly important to navigate the explicit behavioral captures of our implicit progression through our day-to-day.
The challenge of implicitness is… an ethical challenge.
5 guidelines of designing for ubiquitous computing
- Ubiquitous systems must default to a mode that ensures their users safety (physical, psychic and financial). Graceful degredation moved towards a default to harmlessness, based on cultural definitions.
- Be self-disclosing; ubicomp must contain provisions for immediate and transparent querying of their ownership, use, capabilities, etc. Seamless interaction in physical spaces must be optional, as ubicomp could invade the privacy of individuals. “Seemfullness with beautiful seems.”
- Be conservative of face; allowing people to save face. Ubicomp must not unnecessarily embarrass, humiliate or shame their users. Humane interfaces must be taken into consideration, especially while designing the experience of invisible ubicomp systems.
- Be conservative of time
- Be deniable; allow for the opt out of the program at any time. Alternatives should be provided to people who want to avoid these systems.
Disclaimer: This is live blogging; all quotes are paraphrases.