More Net Neutrality Spin

Jay Ovittore — the newly elected President of the The Young Democrats of Guilford County (congrats again, Jay) — caught the telcom and cable lobby once again spinning more lies about net neutrality.

If you’re still unclear as to why net neutrality matters, I highly recommend you take a minute to watch the following clip from The Daily Show.

Now that you’re armed with this foundational knowledge, put yourself in the shoes of cable executives (and their executive partners in the telcom industry) and think like these guys do for a minute. If you can make that leap into the pits of capitalism, it’s not too difficult to understand why they want to turn the internet into a toll road.

The Little Internet That Could

The first pass of the web (circa 1994 to 2001) wasn’t much of a threat to existing cable and media business models. We might have placed video online back then, but it was time consuming, costly and, relatively speaking, not viral at all.

Sure, once in a while clips like Dancing Baby caught the attention of the masses, but without the benefit of mass email spam between friends, they had to be sparked by inclusion in traditional mainstream media (in the case of Dancing Baby, the hit show Ally McBeal proved to be the tipping point).

Such crossover instances of viral exposure/marketing were few and far between and proved to be an intangible strategy that neither individuals or media professionals alike could leverage to spread their message, music, movies, etc.

All that has changed with the recent developments in viral infrastructure.

With the rise of video sharing sites (like YouTube or Revver) and millions of decentralized blogs — all pre-enabled to deliver embedded video at no cost — media networks are beginning to move content to these new distribution channels at a pace to keep up with the consumption patterns of today’s generation who are moving away from the boob tube.


(originally uploaded by Ian Chase)

It’s only a matter of time until advertising models are developed to monetize this organic delivery of non-programmed content and that’s when the great media exodus from TV to Web will occur. I’m not saying TV will go under completely, but the future of pre-programmed cable TV — the Golden Goose of of executive revenue — is not looking as viable as it did just 5 years ago. As a matter of fact, it’s beginning to look quite bleak.

So how do these old media distribution channels respond to such change? They don’t attempt to build anything useful for people to use that fits their new media habits, instead, they try to lobby for control to carve this new media distribution pie — a pie that they had *no hand* in innovating, evangelizing or iterating.

Capitalism 101.

If this isn’t enough information for your appetite, check out this archive of net neutrality goodness. Or simply run a search here, here or here.

If net neutrality is legislated away, you just might be paying for those searches in the not so distant future.

0 thoughts on “More Net Neutrality Spin

  1. Unfortunately, I have to take issue with the notion that the Daily Show’s summary of the Net Neutrality debate is an accurate and complete one. In fact, it really ignores one of the fundamental points in the debate.

    Internet service providers need to generate income in order to operate. The only way they generate income is through paying customers. Cutting their customers’ access to websites will result in unhappy customers, and that will result in decreased business and decreased revenue. No business in its right mind wants to discourage customers from sticking around, and as a result no ISP in its right mind would cut access to websites. It’s just bad business.

    Like

  2. i wondered how long it would take for you scum to drop by and spin some more. won’t even use your real name, eh?

    isp’s (cable companies moving forward) are already charging $40 a month for broadband access. no one on the net neutrality side is suggesting that they can’t test the market and attempt to charge more as their expenses increase (that’s how a free market system is supposed to work), but you and i know the issue at hand has nothing to do with the cable companies staying in business.

    it’s about cable companies trying to bilk us outside the free market system through lobbied efforts of legislating “channels” on the web — channels that don’t exist now and never should.

    just ask tim berners-lee his opinion on the matter; you know, the guy who invented the internet? i think he might have more perspective on the matter than your special interest group.

    go slime back to your lobbying efforts elsewhere, bitch.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s